Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website

Full Version: Merseyrail
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428
Another dreadful evening peak from Merseyrail tonight. New heights of silliness were reached with the short-forming of the 16.51 Hunts Cross - Southport, which has to be the busiest single service of the PM peak anywhere on the network. I've never previously seen this running as a three outside severe stock shortages, and with good reason. The conditions on board (the service was operated by the poor 508136) were appalling, and I actually could feel a slight crush in the door bay where I was stood. The guard, who to his credit was polite and helpful with his announcements, had clearly been misinformed, telling people who were uncomfortable to try to get a seat on the service 5 minutes behind, which was formed of 6 cars according to him. Of course, it wasn't - the 17.13 Central - Southport almost never is - and when it arrived into Sandhills (507011), it was as dangerously crush-loaded as 508136 was. It looked unsafe to be on board both trains, and I couldn't believe the 16.51 was short-formed to be honest.

Also running as a 3 car vice 6 this evening peak was the 17.25 Liverpool Central - Ormskirk. This was 508108 running alone, almost as badly crush-loaded as the two Southport trains. Neither of these short-formings was announced as such at Central.

I've thought for a while the way Southport trains are formed into sixes in the PM peak is inviting trouble, and so it proved tonight. The problem lies in the way the units which form the 16.51 from Hunts Cross (originating as the 15.43 from Southport) are both used between the peaks, coupled on arrival at Southport. If this service were formed of one of the two pairs which are coupled all day and stabled at Southport during the off-peak, it wouldn't be a problem. It would be easy to switch the formations around; as it is now, they are just inviting trouble as seen tonight. The reason given for the short-formation was a fault coupling with the other unit at Southport.

Caption boards on both Northern and Wirral Lines were today not displaying the length of trains unless they were 6 cars. In fact, 508136's service was farcically advertised as a 6 car, then displaying "cancelled" once it had arrived. A poor show all round.
The West Kirby service this evening was also busy. I saw 507021 full to bursting on the 16:08 out of lime street
The Ormskirk short formation was due to a points failure in the early afternoon that caused services to ormskirk and kirkby to start from Walton and Rice Lane for a short time (1440 to 1505)

Recently the Southport service seems to regularly have coupling difficulties , but for some reason they seem to like running as 3 cars , rather than trying to persevere and when coupled run the 6 car empty to Liverpool Central to take up its return work . A 6 car from Liverpool is better than a 3 Car from Hunts Cross which may well be a bit on the busy side from the South Liverpool stations .
(30/10/2012 19:08)507009 Wrote: [ -> ]Another dreadful evening peak from Merseyrail tonight. New heights of silliness were reached with the short-forming of the 16.51 Hunts Cross - Southport, which has to be the busiest single service of the PM peak anywhere on the network. I've never previously seen this running as a three outside severe stock shortages, and with good reason. The conditions on board (the service was operated by the poor 508136) were appalling, and I actually could feel a slight crush in the door bay where I was stood. The guard, who to his credit was polite and helpful with his announcements, had clearly been misinformed, telling people who were uncomfortable to try to get a seat on the service 5 minutes behind, which was formed of 6 cars according to him. Of course, it wasn't - the 17.13 Central - Southport almost never is - and when it arrived into Sandhills (507011), it was as dangerously crush-loaded as 508136 was. It looked unsafe to be on board both trains, and I couldn't believe the 16.51 was short-formed to be honest.

Also running as a 3 car vice 6 this evening peak was the 17.25 Liverpool Central - Ormskirk. This was 508108 running alone, almost as badly crush-loaded as the two Southport trains. Neither of these short-formings was announced as such at Central.

I've thought for a while the way Southport trains are formed into sixes in the PM peak is inviting trouble, and so it proved tonight. The problem lies in the way the units which form the 16.51 from Hunts Cross (originating as the 15.43 from Southport) are both used between the peaks, coupled on arrival at Southport. If this service were formed of one of the two pairs which are coupled all day and stabled at Southport during the off-peak, it wouldn't be a problem. It would be easy to switch the formations around; as it is now, they are just inviting trouble as seen tonight. The reason given for the short-formation was a fault coupling with the other unit at Southport.

Caption boards on both Northern and Wirral Lines were today not displaying the length of trains unless they were 6 cars. In fact, 508136's service was farcically advertised as a 6 car, then displaying "cancelled" once it had arrived. A poor show all round.

AFAIK the 15.43 from Southport 6 cars comes off Southport Sidings, where it's been since the morning peak runs, so there may have been a swap sometime during the day
(31/10/2012 00:00)507022 Wrote: [ -> ]AFAIK the 15.43 from Southport 6 cars comes off Southport Sidings, where it's been since the morning peak runs, so there may have been a swap sometime during the day

My understanding is that the two pairs that are stabled in sidings between the peaks usually run the 15.13 and 15.58 departures from Southport. The 15.43, 16.13 and 16.43 are normally made up of six off-peak allocated units, and the 16.28 is a combination of a stabled and off-peak allocated unit.

In practice, the two stabled 6 cars are usually kept in Southport's platform 1 and the adjacent wall siding, with the single set for the 16.28 stabled in the carriage sidings proper.
i noticed the shortages as well, at about five to four at formby a UID unit had gone through ECS with it's horns going and 508136 and the 16:13 from southport were short formed as well. but i understand the coupling faults at southport but what units are out of service causing the shortage of trains
The 16.13 wasn't short-formed yesterday, worked by 507016 and 507027.
acoording to one of the boards at formby but wasnt sure whether it was 3 or 6 car
507012 has suffered a graffiti attack this evening Sad
(01/11/2012 21:48)jtd508110 Wrote: [ -> ]507012 has suffered a graffiti attack this evening Sad

Thats not good wheres it stabled as dont think its in service at the mo is it?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428
Reference URL's