Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website

Full Version: First Manchester
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731
(02/06/2019 12:11)WhiteVanMan Wrote: [ -> ]I believe that the sale fell through, due to Vantage not being part of the sale.

No one would pull of out of a sale if Vantage wasn't included in the deal, the exact opposite in fact.

As far as I'm aware the Bolton sale is still on-going, the Oldham sale fell through at the 11th hour, but may have since found an alternative buyer ?
(05/06/2019 10:58)Winston Wrote: [ -> ]No one would pull of out of a sale if Vantage wasn't included in the deal, the exact opposite in fact.

As far as I'm aware the Bolton sale is still on-going, the Oldham sale fell through at the 11th hour, but may have since found an alternative buyer ?

The Vantage tender wasn't what you think, or so I understand, the tender is losing money at the moment, but after a certain stage it goes into Profit from what I understand, and is carrying good numbers, unlike many other Bolton services, it would be worth having, even if just that it might be able to put you forward as a keen and preferred bidder next time based on the fact that you've run it successfully for x number of years.

Also the vehicles there will allow fleet modernisation elsewhere after 5 years maybe in house, as I understand the 25 Hybrid vehicles were purchased by First on behalf of TfGM rather than owned by them, the forthcoming Electric vehicles however will be owned by TfGM, therefore you could use the 25 Hybrids to replace a proportion of the Bolton fleet in about 21 months time, which will no doubt be welcome there. No doubt they will be used to see off ageing Volvo B7RLE's.
(05/06/2019 10:58)Winston Wrote: [ -> ]No one would pull of out of a sale if Vantage wasn't included in the deal, the exact opposite in fact.

As far as I'm aware the Bolton sale is still on-going, the Oldham sale fell through at the 11th hour, but may have since found an alternative buyer ?

There was a report of a Ex Manager driving round Oldham depot other day without a reason that manager works for other group. the person could not remember who mind you but it maybe bit of spying
Whatever happens Bolton and Oldham will go soon first are desperate to get shut they have nothing much left in Bolton....who is gonna buy that's the question..is go ahead to get a discount if it should gain bolton and oldham
(05/06/2019 14:47)gilesbus1 Wrote: [ -> ]The Vantage tender wasn't what you think, or so I understand, the tender is losing money at the moment, but after a certain stage it goes into Profit from what I understand, and is carrying good numbers, unlike many other Bolton services, it would be worth having, even if just that it might be able to put you forward as a keen and preferred bidder next time based on the fact that you've run it successfully for x number of years.

Also the vehicles there will allow fleet modernisation elsewhere after 5 years maybe in house, as I understand the 25 Hybrid vehicles were purchased by First on behalf of TfGM rather than owned by them, the forthcoming Electric vehicles however will be owned by TfGM, therefore you could use the 25 Hybrids to replace a proportion of the Bolton fleet in about 21 months time, which will no doubt be welcome there. No doubt they will be used to see off ageing Volvo B7RLE's.

Yes, the contract is losing money, big money, as I understand it, it doesn't matter what the passenger loadings are like, as it's not First that receive the revenue, that's the problem it's an operating contract. I've heard that it's not worth taking on the Vantage contract unless a break clause on the current contract can be negotiated to exit early or re-negotiate early, hence my earlier comments.

As Manchester will be going Euro 6, most of the depot fleets will either need replacing or upgrading. The Hybrids are high spec, I understand that the new electrics will only free up 5 Hybrids for use elsewhere, but that plan may change depending to who & when Bolton is sold.
(05/06/2019 22:18)Winston Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, the contract is losing money, big money, as I understand it, it doesn't matter what the passenger loadings are like, as it's not First that receive the revenue, that's the problem it's an operating contract. I've heard that it's not worth taking on the Vantage contract unless a break clause on the current contract can be negotiated to exit early or re-negotiate early, hence my earlier comments.

As Manchester will be going Euro 6, most of the depot fleets will either need replacing or upgrading. The Hybrids are high spec, I understand that the new electrics will only free up 5 Hybrids for use elsewhere, but that plan may change depending to who & when Bolton is sold.

As I understand it operators put in a bid when Vantage was going to become a reality around 12 months or more in advance. The FirstGroup bid was extremely low, Stagecoach expressed an interest and the other bidder was Arriva North West. Stagecoach walked away as the FirstGroup bid was too low and they believed they couldn't compete for it and make a profit and FirstGroup was named preferred bidder for obvious reasons, I understand the first half of the contract is at a loss to FirstGroup but not of vast sums, in the second half its supposed to break even and then eventually return a small profit, but as we are past more than half of the first half the remainder is not as bad as it might look. If it was that bad and First wanted to pull out of Bolton and TfGM insists on rebidding if the contract is past on why do FirstGroup simply not pull out of it and hand it back to TfGM seeing as they have nothing to lose in your words?

I understand that all 25 vehicles are there for 5 years so after another 22 months that fleet becomes redundant, so if Bolton and those are still together they will become part of Bolton's main fleet, unless other depots are part of the same network (Oldham??? Rotala??? Go North West ???), no doubt they would spread them around perhaps, but they are worth having as by that time it will be a crucial point in conversion to Euro 5 as a minimum and the fact that they exceed that and are Hybrid into the equation means they will be useful additions to stock and could replace a large section of the fleet as in future new vehicles are likely to be bought outright by TfGM instead so therefore no outlay and they would be able to distribute them to other operations in the TfGM area or sell them on the open market if they desired.

I understand that First is also renegotiating the contract currently to get more money to cover extra operations involving the extra 10 electric vehicles due around Christmas time if everything goes to plan, so that might alter the profitability of the contract also. Of course all that is presuming they still have it by then. Maybe Rotala, Arriva and Stagecoach might try if First are forced to walk away.

The big loses at Bolton come in the form of the Bolton to Manchester routes because of heavy rail and bus competition on them and the failure to match things like price, time keeping and also quality and poor customer service systems, e.g. the customer information line being based at Leeds, everything the company has done to try to reduce costs have ended up making things worse and instead increasing costs.

The main issue is poor overall management, regular changes of managing director for no good reason, and poor morale of driving and mechanical staff which doesn't reflect well on the public.

The withdrawal of key town routes at Bolton either doesn't help as they;ve failed to recognise that people who get routes like the 575 might buy a FirstDay for onwards travel into Manchester and by doing so they have lost that custom who then have decided they may as well use the train from Horwich Parkway for example. Those figures lost are big £5.00 here and there overall is a lot of money, I note Go Ahead are already talking about service enhancements and moral has picked up no end, similar happened when Lothian bought Musselborough Depot from First, the staff moral picked up no end and service go better, not back to what it once was, but to what was bringing in profit by enhancement, even night services now run into places like North Berwick. That is whats needed with the business going forward, surely operating buses in Bolton isn't rocket science and a town the size of Bolton plus other surrounding area's in Bury, Rochdale, Wigan and Salford should ideally bring in a decent profit. But unfortunately they've let things slip with there eye off the ball and let other operators walk away with substantial chunks of what should be there's eg Arriva, Rotala, Stagecoach, Transdev, Tyrers and Vision Bus over about a ten year period.

Also the other issue with Bolton is that the Wigan operations complemented them and actually made a profit be it small, yet First failed to grasp that and sold it on to Stagecoach after treating the public in Wigan and Leigh badly with a fleet of old bangers and high fares, after running it well till 2000 when HQ at Aberdeen demanded the new buses that were at Wigan to go to Aberdeen depot to support a Volvo maintenance contract, something Wigan's fleet never recovered from.

I think any operator taking over will need a plan of action to deal with issues at Bolton, Bury etc to bring operations back into profitability given other operators have replaced some parts of the network and First vehicles really now don't operate anywhere North of Bolton which is a large chunk of the town.

Of course First could walk away and hand Vantage back to TfGM and let Arriva Bolton, Stagecoach Wigan, Rotala, Transdev and Vision register over everything they have, but the fact they haven't done yet means there may be some hope there all be it slim. A fragmented bus network any further would be terrible news for the people of Bury, Bolton, Atherton and Leigh and is something I wish not to see. Car usership would increase further and also the bus network would only end up operating largely in Monday to Saturday day times only, on what the operators believe they can make a profit on, through ticketing would end or the price of fares would rise as people would then need the more expensive TfGM Day Ticket in order to interconnect something already an issue in Leigh and Bury. Lets also not forget Bolton has no Metrolink network either so that's not an option either.
(05/06/2019 23:36)gilesbus1 Wrote: [ -> ]As I understand it operators put in a bid when Vantage was going to become a reality around 12 months or more in advance. The FirstGroup bid was extremely low, Stagecoach expressed an interest and the other bidder was Arriva North West. Stagecoach walked away as the FirstGroup bid was too low and they believed they couldn't compete for it and make a profit and FirstGroup was named preferred bidder for obvious reasons, I understand the first half of the contract is at a loss to FirstGroup but not of vast sums, in the second half its supposed to break even and then eventually return a small profit, but as we are past more than half of the first half the remainder is not as bad as it might look. If it was that bad and First wanted to pull out of Bolton and TfGM insists on rebidding if the contract is past on why do FirstGroup simply not pull out of it and hand it back to TfGM seeing as they have nothing to lose in your words?

I understand that all 25 vehicles are there for 5 years so after another 22 months that fleet becomes redundant, so if Bolton and those are still together they will become part of Bolton's main fleet, unless other depots are part of the same network (Oldham??? Rotala??? Go North West ???), no doubt they would spread them around perhaps, but they are worth having as by that time it will be a crucial point in conversion to Euro 5 as a minimum and the fact that they exceed that and are Hybrid into the equation means they will be useful additions to stock and could replace a large section of the fleet as in future new vehicles are likely to be bought outright by TfGM instead so therefore no outlay and they would be able to distribute them to other operations in the TfGM area or sell them on the open market if they desired.

I understand that First is also renegotiating the contract currently to get more money to cover extra operations involving the extra 10 electric vehicles due around Christmas time if everything goes to plan, so that might alter the profitability of the contract also. Of course all that is presuming they still have it by then. Maybe Rotala, Arriva and Stagecoach might try if First are forced to walk away.

The big loses at Bolton come in the form of the Bolton to Manchester routes because of heavy rail and bus competition on them and the failure to match things like price, time keeping and also quality and poor customer service systems, e.g. the customer information line being based at Leeds, everything the company has done to try to reduce costs have ended up making things worse and instead increasing costs.

The main issue is poor overall management, regular changes of managing director for no good reason, and poor morale of driving and mechanical staff which doesn't reflect well on the public.

The withdrawal of key town routes at Bolton either doesn't help as they;ve failed to recognise that people who get routes like the 575 might buy a FirstDay for onwards travel into Manchester and by doing so they have lost that custom who then have decided they may as well use the train from Horwich Parkway for example. Those figures lost are big £5.00 here and there overall is a lot of money, I note Go Ahead are already talking about service enhancements and moral has picked up no end, similar happened when Lothian bought Musselborough Depot from First, the staff moral picked up no end and service go better, not back to what it once was, but to what was bringing in profit by enhancement, even night services now run into places like North Berwick. That is whats needed with the business going forward, surely operating buses in Bolton isn't rocket science and a town the size of Bolton plus other surrounding area's in Bury, Rochdale, Wigan and Salford should ideally bring in a decent profit. But unfortunately they've let things slip with there eye off the ball and let other operators walk away with substantial chunks of what should be there's eg Arriva, Rotala, Stagecoach, Transdev, Tyrers and Vision Bus over about a ten year period.

Also the other issue with Bolton is that the Wigan operations complemented them and actually made a profit be it small, yet First failed to grasp that and sold it on to Stagecoach after treating the public in Wigan and Leigh badly with a fleet of old bangers and high fares, after running it well till 2000 when HQ at Aberdeen demanded the new buses that were at Wigan to go to Aberdeen depot to support a Volvo maintenance contract, something Wigan's fleet never recovered from.

I think any operator taking over will need a plan of action to deal with issues at Bolton, Bury etc to bring operations back into profitability given other operators have replaced some parts of the network and First vehicles really now don't operate anywhere North of Bolton which is a large chunk of the town.

Of course First could walk away and hand Vantage back to TfGM and let Arriva Bolton, Stagecoach Wigan, Rotala, Transdev and Vision register over everything they have, but the fact they haven't done yet means there may be some hope there all be it slim. A fragmented bus network any further would be terrible news for the people of Bury, Bolton, Atherton and Leigh and is something I wish not to see. Car usership would increase further and also the bus network would only end up operating largely in Monday to Saturday day times only, on what the operators believe they can make a profit on, through ticketing would end or the price of fares would rise as people would then need the more expensive TfGM Day Ticket in order to interconnect something already an issue in Leigh and Bury. Lets also not forget Bolton has no Metrolink network either so that's not an option either.

As I understand it, Bolton is the biggest loss making within First Manchester, my comments regarding Vantage contributing heavily towards that loss date back to late Jan this year, so things / negotiations between interested parties / First & TfGM could have moved forward since then.

I can't see First simply walking away for their remaining Manchester depots, they will be incurring big enough asset write-downs as seen on the QS depot sale to Go-Ahead as it is and would then incur the costs of shutting down the ops / staff redundancy etc.
(06/06/2019 11:40)Winston Wrote: [ -> ]As I understand it, Bolton is the biggest loss making within First Manchester, my comments regarding Vantage contributing heavily towards that loss date back to late Jan this year, so things / negotiations between interested parties / First & TfGM could have moved forward since then.

I can't see First simply walking away for their remaining Manchester depots, they will be incurring big enough asset write-downs as seen on the QS depot sale to Go-Ahead as it is and would then incur the costs of shutting down the ops / staff redundancy etc.

Could it not work selling the routes individually (With enough buses to cover the PVR) and then transferring drivers under TUPE. I think a big thing with these sales is the depot costs. If anyone wanted to buy Bolton, you are then taking a lot like the maintenance teams and a lot of routes which you may not want. If Bolton is doing so badly financially, the routes will be what ops want.

Operators don't want to be tied down with another depot if they can accommodate things in their existing depots and all the depot costs like the management, allocators etc. I think it might be for the best for First to simply sell individual routes as then ops staff won't be needed and maintenance will be covered. People would have to be made redundant but with operators taking on more work, they will likely find another job in the near future.

All companies have different levels of viability so any potential buyer for the whole depot would rely on the company making big changes. Individual routes means everyone can take what is viable for them.
(06/06/2019 11:40)Winston Wrote: [ -> ]As I understand it, Bolton is the biggest loss making within First Manchester, my comments regarding Vantage contributing heavily towards that loss date back to late Jan this year, so things / negotiations between interested parties / First & TfGM could have moved forward since then.

I can't see First simply walking away for their remaining Manchester depots, they will be incurring big enough asset write-downs as seen on the QS depot sale to Go-Ahead as it is and would then incur the costs of shutting down the ops / staff redundancy etc.
Yes and no one wants that cost of cleaning Mumps as the reason first never moved to the old British gas depot so mumps has to stay as a bus depot as it would cost a lot to remove the ground from the site after years of diesel spills.
(02/06/2019 19:04)gilesbus1 Wrote: [ -> ]I think this with Vantage is quite strange maybe someone who works for TfGM can enlighten us to what the rules are.

Is it that if a depot is sold separately, the Vantage contract cannot transfer and has to be re-tendered, or is it that if FirstGroup buses is sold as one bulk lot then its not in breach and it continues unchanged to whoever the new owner is as continuation of business? So as if Winston says Mr Souter forms Souter holdings and buys all FirstGroup bus operations out then that company would have the franchise under existing conditions? or would that also be a breach on contract and therefore need rescinding?

Of course another option could be placing it under the Metrolink operation and them operating it from one of there sites or another temporary site under TfGM control in a caretaker role until a new tender was validated?

It isunfortunate that TfGM could not agree a pragmatic compromise. In London, when First sold up the new owners simply kept the contracts until due for retender, admittedly with mixed results when the time came. It's a pity that TfGM did not let "New Bolton" or whoever run the Vantage routes until they secured a new contract, whether "New Bolton" or a 3rd part operator (such as Stagecoach who would probably not have been allowed to buy First Bolton en masse).
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731
Reference URL's