Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website

Full Version: First Manchester
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731
(27/03/2013 20:28)Wright Eclipse Wrote: [ -> ]
(27/03/2013 19:56)jimbo Wrote: [ -> ]Nice to see fare reductions, the monthly from tfgm or online is a pain in the arse... But no doubt to stop fakes... As of the x82 that will seize to exist later this year then

i never even knew manchester could get monthly tickets on bus,West Yorkshires has been online or at Leeds Travel Shop for years now

Used to get monthly tickets when travelling to Huddersfield uni on the 184 a few years ago, so it has been around for a while. The switch to online/Travelshops now basically brings First Manchester in line with other areas, such as West Yorkshire, who don't sell monthly tickets on the bus.

As for the X82 (and 181/182), I could see the service still running between Royton and Manchester, so may be possible that the old 20 service is resurrected or the X82 is curtailed. Also wouldn't be surprised to see a drop in the 181/182 service later in the year. Perhaps down to every 20 mins with two 181s and one 182 or even perhaps reverting back to the old half-hourly frequency (one each hour) and then the 24 increased to every 30 mins to keep a 15 minute frequency between Royton, Chadderton and Manchester.
This is the problem though, if they do this, tfgm may provide more funding to run the service... May be a game for them, they dotn want to fund it okay... We shall reduce it a crap load until people complain and thry fund it again
Considering X82 passes my house I've always got chance to see the loadings on this service and not to sure where passengers get on in the morning or get off at night but most journeys in the morning by the time they pass my house have quite healthy loads sometimes full and the same in the evening peaks, I can actually see some of the later X82s being withdrawn as its really only 17:07, 17:21 & 17:45 that really carry the full loads out of Manchester, the 18:15 from Piccadilly can be a bit hit and miss passenger wise and not really sure about 18:45 as I've only really caught it the odd time and there's didn't seem to be that many people on it
62146 has transfered out of Manchester fleet http://www.flickr.com/photos/thespian/85.../contacts/
I'm sure it was asked about the other day but I have just seen B201DTU in a yard somewhere near guide bridge :P
Very chuft about cheaper tickets, I have never seen First do this kind of thing. First seem to want to improve their reputation and their operational practices, perhaps they are letting local management have more freedom?

I did not know the X82 was subsidised, I wonder why with large amount of services in the particular areas it serves.

Can you remind me of route 20? Didn't that go all the way to Bacup? I am certain First had a service all the way up to Bacup through that area.

(23/03/2013 23:34)SF07 Wrote: [ -> ]
(23/03/2013 22:55)Metroline1511 Wrote: [ -> ]In a way it is right for First Manchester to reduce the prices of their day and longer-period tickets. These cover a narrower area since they sold the Wigan operation to Stagecoach late last year.

Did think that too. I wouldn't be surprised if that was one of the factors for the reductions. I'm sure the Metrolink extension to Oldham, Shaw and Rochdale plus Stagecoach's takeover of Bluebird and the success of the Oldham and M60 tickets could be other factors. Also, First would probably want some more positive publicity given some of the criticisms they've had in the past.

Indeed the Metrolink will have an impact on services, and now in the Moston area have competition with JPT and Stagecoach, who is far more formidable than Bluebird. I still reckon they need to increase frequency to win back that area but cheaper feares will help an awful lot.
(01/04/2013 21:03)Polo Mint Wrote: [ -> ]Can you remind me of route 20? Didn't that go all the way to Bacup? I am certain First had a service all the way up to Bacup through that area.

Service 20 ran via the X82 route between Manchester and Royton except for running via Oldham Road to Broadway junction before running all the way up Broadway instead of via Dean Lane and Nuthurst Lane. From Royton, the 20 followed the 24 route to Rochdale before continuing to Bacup via 464 route.

(01/04/2013 21:03)Polo Mint Wrote: [ -> ]Indeed the Metrolink will have an impact on services, and now in the Moston area have competition with JPT and Stagecoach, who is far more formidable than Bluebird. I still reckon they need to increase frequency to win back that area but cheaper feares will help an awful lot.

First are quite frequent in the Moston area with the 81/81A running a combined 10 minute service and 88/89 running every 10 minutes between White Moss, Moston and Manchester. JPT have 9 buses per hour (every 10 mins on 118, every 20 mins on 112), while Stagecoach run every 20 mins on the 112 (interesting to see what they do later in the year with the ex-Bluebird services).

First do offer a Moston return ticket, allowing passengers to travel between Moston and Manchester for £2.50 return. The weekly ticket was scrapped following the introduction of the FirstM60 tickets.
The X82 was subsidised as a replacement for obviously the Oldham Loop Line's closure. I don't see the bus service lasting at any point soon however when the novelty of the tram wears off a demand may be reintroduced, as to be quite honest I find that the bus is twice as flexible and doesn't take that much longer to get into Manchester.

If I was in charge it would still be trains, and if that was not financially viable anymore the whole route would have been tarmac'd and run as a dedicated bus way (not guided, I find that is a waste of money too and can cause stack ups if one vehicle breaks down (as with rail), not only that but the pathetic 'training' required for drivers using the guided busway).

You can trust my opinion as a regular commuter to Salford Quays on the metrolink - it's a novelty that will die quickly. It is absolutely cr*p.
Not sure if Tameside drivers are unfamiliar with what route to take through Oldham town centre or if it was a time-saving move but the 343 took a slightly different route into Oldham bus station this evening.

Instead of going from Lees Road to Oldham bus station through Mumps, Union Street and Clegg Street, the driver decided to turn off onto Cross Street then up Shaw Road to Egerton Street before re-joining the normal route on St Mary's Way. Was even more unusual when a passenger actually got on the bus on Egerton Street, even though the last bus was officially an hour earlier on the 410. Would have had a long wait otherwise.
(03/04/2013 20:23)SF07 Wrote: [ -> ]Not sure if Tameside drivers are unfamiliar with what route to take through Oldham town centre or if it was a time-saving move but the 343 took a slightly different route into Oldham bus station this evening.

Instead of going from Lees Road to Oldham bus station through Mumps, Union Street and Clegg Street, the driver decided to turn off onto Cross Street then up Shaw Road to Egerton Street before re-joining the normal route on St Mary's Way. Was even more unusual when a passenger actually got on the bus on Egerton Street, even though the last bus was officially an hour earlier on the 410. Would have had a long wait otherwise.

It dosen't surprise me. Tameside drivers tend to do what they want including using thier mobile phones while driving and alighting outside Ashton Bus Station when they are ofically told not too!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731
Reference URL's