(05/09/2012 16:56)P528LND Wrote: [ -> ]We know what First are like with consistency in numbers these days so I wouldn't bank on it. Considering 37389 and 37390 are at Bolton too, I don't thinnk they'll source buses from both depots just to keep numbers consecutive :P
you never know with 1st the other year they had 31925/27/29/30
if the other 9 come from Oldham then it could be 37412/13 but just wait and see
some in the 37545 to 61 batch do not even have fleetnames and there is rummors of some going to west yorkshire
(05/09/2012 16:56)P528LND Wrote: [ -> ]We know what First are like with consistency in numbers these days so I wouldn't bank on it. Considering 37389 and 37390 are at Bolton too, I don't thinnk they'll source buses from both depots just to keep numbers consecutive :P
I noctie that 33755 is the only Enviro route branded 409 i wonder if they will keep this branding ones in a neat batch
More bloody Arrows at BN, spotted 31928 and 31941 out and about earlier.
(05/09/2012 17:53)WWH44L Wrote: [ -> ]More bloody Arrows at BN, spotted 31928 and 31941 out and about earlier.
you might be getting pioneers as well
A couple of Darts out on the 36 and 37 this afternoon
this weeks news allocations up to sunday just gone
31917/18/20/21/22 withdrawn
33668/92/703/8/38/41/44/45/46/47/48/52/55 Oldham
34291 Wigan
39935 Reserve
40322 back in service at Oldham
40422 pioneer
60272/76 Oldham for Training puproses [update 60272 reported back at Bury
60448 Birkenhead
66861/69/70/76 Bolton
66880/90/92/97 Bury
68218 gone
pioneer fleet
40366 withdrawn
(05/09/2012 17:27)mic Wrote: [ -> ] (05/09/2012 16:56)P528LND Wrote: [ -> ]We know what First are like with consistency in numbers these days so I wouldn't bank on it. Considering 37389 and 37390 are at Bolton too, I don't thinnk they'll source buses from both depots just to keep numbers consecutive :P
I noctie that 33755 is the only Enviro route branded 409 i wonder if they will keep this branding ones in a neat batch
Lovely bus went on it today
37389/90 linked with a possible move to BY
(05/09/2012 19:44)Damien Wrote: [ -> ]37389/90 linked with a possible move to BY
sounds right as well to link up with 37391 to 93
Noticed they finally got round to changing, some legals on the 40313/6 batch of solos