Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website

Full Version: First Manchester
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731
(05/12/2016 16:46)WhiteVanMan Wrote: [ -> ]Also Stagecoach have been giving First, a run for they money in Ashton for some time now.

Hardly.
They share the 346 and I emphasise the word share.
Apart from that they don't compete. Yes stagecoach took a few tenders off First a couple of years back but First recently won some of them back.
The only big threat in Tameside where tenders are concerned is MCT as there renowned for putting in very low prices to pick up work which fits in with existing contracts.
(06/12/2016 00:04)T42 PVM Wrote: [ -> ]I would of thought the 135 would move to Queens Road as would be a lot less dead running and after the PVR cuts over the years i would expect they do have the room for it

You could move the 135 to Queens Road (But there probably isn't room for 18m almost life-expired bendybuses?) and move the 53 to Rusholme
Now hears an interesting one, just read something on another forum that I've actually heard a while back but haven't mentioned it on here, apparantly QS will have some space next year for these extra services gained from Depot Closures as First have apparantly lost Metroshuttle Contract although who to I'm not to sure if I'm honest, the questions are:

1> Have First lost Metroshuttle Contract?

2> Who's going to be operating the Metroshuttles? Obviously has to be somone that has got space within the depots for the vehicles that would go with it, I'd say someone like MCT or even Stagecoach but could be proved wrong
(06/12/2016 07:16)M60lad Wrote: [ -> ]Now hears an interesting one, just read something on another forum that I've actually heard a while back but haven't mentioned it on here, apparantly QS will have some space next year for these extra services gained from Depot Closures as First have apparantly lost Metroshuttle Contract although who to I'm not to sure if I'm honest, the questions are:

1> Have First lost Metroshuttle Contract?

2> Who's going to be operating the Metroshuttles? Obviously has to be somone that has got space within the depots for the vehicles that would go with it, I'd say someone like MCT or even Stagecoach but could be proved wrong

Could that not equal driver loss as im sure metroshutle drivers are on different pay rates than normal drivers
Metro shuttle drivers are on a lower wage i think but they could transfer with the work if they wanted to under an agreement with the company that wins it.
I very much doubt MCT would win it as there in a shambolic state as it is and the buses would dramatically go down hill maintenance wise as thought they where having problems themselves.
(06/12/2016 08:02)motormayhem1 Wrote: [ -> ]Metro shuttle drivers are on a lower wage i think but they could transfer with the work if they wanted to under an agreement with the company that wins it.
I very much doubt MCT would win it as there in a shambolic state as it is and the buses would dramatically go down hill maintenance wise as thought they where having problems themselves.

Think your absolutely right, MCT couldn't cope with a contract like the city centre Metroshuttles plus their supposedly at maximum with thier ops disks, and apparently a number of thier vehicles were slapped with prohibition notices a couple of months back when VOSA was doing random inspections in Stockport bus station so there could be the possibility of a PI looming.

As for pay, arnt the drivers at Dukinfield on lower pay than those at Oldham? Will drivers get a pay rise if they move to Oldham or will pay stay the same?

It will be interesting to see what happens regarding the Tameside work as let's not forget it's operated on a seperate licence. Presumably they will keep a pool of buses at Oldham just for Pioneer work unless they intend to use on hire signs all the time.
If the drivers move to other depots then there pay would match what the pay is at the depot they move too and sometimes the company may offer fuel allowances for upto 12 months to those who transfer with the depot being closed by the companies choice.
(06/12/2016 12:44)motormayhem1 Wrote: [ -> ]If the drivers move to other depots then there pay would match what the pay is at the depot they move too and sometimes the company may offer fuel allowances for upto 12 months to those who transfer with the depot being closed by the companies choice.

It would make sense that tameside drivers who move to Oldham will receive a pay rise
Queens Roads 37288 is on loan to Bolton and is currently on the 519. Does anyone know why?
(06/12/2016 12:44)motormayhem1 Wrote: [ -> ]If the drivers move to other depots then there pay would match what the pay is at the depot they move too and sometimes the company may offer fuel allowances for upto 12 months to those who transfer with the depot being closed by the companies choice.

I'm not so sure. Tameside drivers have always got lower pay because it's run as a low cost unit. If the facilities move to another depot there still effectively working for the low cost unit.
Don't forget drivers at queens road are on different pay plàns if they work on the Metroshuttle work, plus a number of Dukinfield drivers don't have cars and get picked up by taxi bus early in the morning. Are they really going to send a bus from Oldham every morning for drivers?

Obviously it's a case of wait and see. Will they continue to run pioneer out of Oldham as a seperate entity or simply merge it all into one.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731
Reference URL's