(18/10/2012 23:42)tyresmoke Wrote: [ -> ]21144 still part of the fleet at Stockton. 22063 had just been delivered as I got back to depot at 2345
So three hours from cutting out to arriving back at the depot. Think that shows how poor the 54-reg MANs actually are, given 22063 is the best example.
I fail to see how the length of time it takes to recover a vehicle corresponds to the 'crapness' (or not) of said vehicle, or even the severity of the failure....
Volvo B10BLE 21155 was on 62/63 yesterday (15:00 from N Walbottle)
Volvo B10BLE 21101 was on X63 yesterday (X63 Killi Express stickers covering blind).
(19/10/2012 11:55)park5354 Wrote: [ -> ]Volvo B10BLE 21155 was on 62/63 yesterday (15:00 from N Walbottle)
Volvo B10BLE 21101 was on X63 yesterday (X63 Killi Express stickers covering blind).
First one - very rare, unusual to see anything but Enviro400s on Walkergate's workings (Slatyford's are a different matter however)
21101 has been like that since about its third day back in service. I understand its Dot Matrix was removed for Training Purposes.
You still haven't answered how the amount of time it takes to recover a vehicle relates to the state of said vehicle....
(19/10/2012 20:36)mbonwick Wrote: [ -> ]You still haven't answered how the amount of time it takes to recover a vehicle relates to the state of said vehicle....
Because you've mis-read my original post. The amount of time has noting to do with it - the fact it cut out in the first place when it is said to be the 'best' of the 6 2004 MANs at Stockton shows how bad the batch is.
Everything breaks at some point. I challenge you to name a vehicles that has never ever had a failure of some sort.....
Water getting to EDC thereby shutting off injectors is what I was told, got towed back to depot eventually.
Olympians 16834/5 were on the 13 today, 16839/40 on the 52 later joined by 16832, 16838 was on the 12/34 along with B10BLE 21142.