(23/06/2019 12:19)CX06 EBK Wrote: [ -> ]Unfortunately many people in Liverpool will vote for Labour no matter what, given a lot of people don't appear to like Anderson yet he retains his position would suggest that won't change in the near future.
Going a bit off topic but in Recent Elections in Liverpool Labour has started to lose Ground to the Lib Dems and to a lesser degree The Green Party so would not rule out a change in a few years time. How that would affect planning permission in Liverpool however remains to be seen
The deadline is Jan 2020 because that whole ccms allocated funding runs out on set dates off each phase hence them already starting on the bus hub and Victoria street with no consultation yet . Sadly the consultation is merely a tick box exercise barely anything will change
(25/06/2019 21:16)mr t Wrote: [ -> ]The deadline is Jan 2020 because that whole ccms allocated funding runs out on set dates off each phase hence them already starting on the bus hub and Victoria street with no consultation yet . Sadly the consultation is merely a tick box exercise barely anything will change
It was announced today that the 'brains' behind this total reconfiguration of the city centre roads, Councillor James Noakes, will step down from his role next year and not seek re-election.
(19/06/2019 09:48)DVG526 Wrote: [ -> ]Basically everything from London Road ‘north end’ routes and 76 will terminate at Queen Sq and presumably use the new ‘hub’
Everything from the Adelphi ‘south end’ will go direct to Liverpool One (75/80/82 all avoiding Renshaw St inbound,82CD,86D withdrawn).
Halton14 and 79C will go to Queen Sq via Pembroke Place and London Rd, avoiding Brownlow Hill
No Liverpool buses will serve any other point in the City..
https://liverpoolcitycentrebus.commonplace.is/
Maybe the 26/27 circular will be split, and go just from Queen Square to Liverpool One via Shiel Road? In which case, as it would no longer be an actual circular, it could use say the number 26 in both directions.
(29/06/2019 10:32)Metroline1511 Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe the 26/27 circular will be split, and go just from Queen Square to Liverpool One via Shiel Road? In which case, as it would no longer be an actual circular, it could use say the number 26 in both directions.
According to Merseytravel's website, the 26/27 is unaffected by the proposed changes
(29/06/2019 11:40)Walton 46 Wrote: [ -> ]According to Merseytravel's website, the 26/27 is unaffected by the proposed changes
There zero emission so don't need to be changed.
(29/06/2019 10:32)Metroline1511 Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe the 26/27 circular will be split, and go just from Queen Square to Liverpool One via Shiel Road? In which case, as it would no longer be an actual circular, it could use say the number 26 in both directions.
What a ridiculous suggestion.
(29/06/2019 14:56)motormayhem1 Wrote: [ -> ]There zero emission so don't need to be changed.
If they just made it a low emission bus zone, it wouldn't be so bad as then companies would use the most eco friendly buses on through city routes. That's the issue. It isn't just a low emission bus zone, they want a zero bus zone (that is the aim from what it looks like. It's just cross rivers and other services will be done later on if they get away with this first phase.
(29/06/2019 16:37)MPTE1955 Wrote: [ -> ]What a ridiculous suggestion.
how else can it be run with no cross city services
(23/06/2019 12:31)wirralbus Wrote: [ -> ]Thats the ingrained Party politics of Liverpool .
The only time it changed was after the problems with the Labour Party in the late 1980's.
anywhere else such a clueless muppet like him would be well kicked from office