Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan

[enrag2000]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan

(08/10/2016 18:06)Raawwwrrr! Wrote:  That wouldn't make much sense as the 300 isn't a fare collecting service and therefore you don't require O-discs to run the service. You can legally run a free service with or without O-discs (Similar to how running days do this) but only require them legally to run a route where fares are collected.

It would make sense if for example Stagecoach helped out with the 44 for example or another service, but not the Stockport Metroshuttle

MCT are not running the service for free, they are getting paid to run it! Therefore it is an operation which requires an O-licence.

[acocker96]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan

(09/10/2016 07:19)enrag2000 Wrote:  MCT are not running the service for free, they are getting paid to run it! Therefore it is an operation which requires an O-licence.

These O-discs are they the second disc under what used to be the tax disc on a bus?

[motormayhem1]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan

(09/10/2016 13:40)acocker96 Wrote:  These O-discs arec they the second disc under what used to be the tax disc on a bus?

Yeah there a blue disc that used to be under the tax disc.

[YSV-205]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan

(07/10/2016 23:03)Raawwwrrr! Wrote:  No-one on this forum will know the answer to that, It's my degree and I still couldn't tell you, and it's something that is never a fixed amount.

Advertising a full side on a bus is much more expensive to the framed adverts as you can imagine. The bigger the advert, the more expensive it is.

Cost depends on the following factors: Vehicle type (A single decker is cheaper than a double), Advert Size (Is your advert using one side of the bus? or all four?), Advert type (Are you covering up windows? are you just advertising around them?), and the main factor: How long do you want your advert on the side of a vehicle (or vehicles?).

Advertising on buses also depends on the area. If you're advertising on a bus in rural Yorkshire, it's much cheaper to do than in a big city. As you can probably imagine as well, a bus in Manchester or London will be seen more and also will probably have a longer service day on the road.

If you are making an advert with a company (for example the Deepwater Horizon). If you just advertise on one bus, for example stagecoach Manchester's enviro 400 is will be £X. However, if you use the same advert designed by the same advertising or design agency across the UK, cost's will be cheaper per vehicle, but obviously more expensive per the amount of buses used. (A bit like how a 2L bottle of coke is usually cheaper than buying four 500ml bottles)

Cheers Raawwwrrr! I guess it was probably a very difficult question to answer.

[acocker96]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan

(09/10/2016 16:00)motormayhem1 Wrote:  Yeah there a blue disc that used to be under the tax disc.

Thanks motor :up:

[gilbert]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan
Saw the back end of SF08GPK [22587?] in the lower garage at Daw Bank this afternoon behind two other similar buses[which may be 22582 and 22583-ex Ardrossan?] . Anybody know whether they are staying or passing through?

[mbonwick]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan
Staying. The ex-Cambridge 51 regs getting binned; though whether directly replaced or via a cascade remains to be seen.

[Scania3379man]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan
hey guys,

where 630 on stagecoach travel to Highfield Grange Avenue from it is on alx200 enviro? it is from winstanley college? after 1.25pm i saw it pass me on 22357 ALX300.

Thank you guys

Martyn

[gilbert]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan

(07/10/2016 16:36)gilbert Wrote:  How many of the ex Oxford buses are now in service? Have just seen one[12015 on the X57] for the first time.

Have now also seen 12021 on X57 in Bramhall at about 6pm and 12025[on 38] and 12026[on 256] in Piccadilly earlier.

[mbonwick]

RE: Stagecoach Manchester and Wigan
16971 has (for now) escaped the call of T. Wigleys, and has transferred to Lincoln where it looks like it will essentially replace 16901 which has been withdrawn for spares.