Current time: 03/05/2024, 22:18 Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
£45m Liverpool City Centre Transport Scheme
RE: £45m Liverpool City Centre Transport Scheme
a lot of this scheme makes sense, providing the Hanover street area gets better bus only priorities, one thing missing though is the elimination of the biggest source of congestion around Lime street ,the st Johns car park, that needs demolition and re siting elsewhere
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
RE: £45m Liverpool City Centre Transport Scheme
(15/08/2016 14:02)FC Pictures Wrote:  a lot of this scheme makes sense, providing the Hanover street area gets better bus only priorities, one thing missing though is the elimination of the biggest source of congestion around Lime street ,the st Johns car park, that needs demolition and re siting elsewhere

Given that they are closing access from St John's Lane to Lime Street, I would imagine they'd keep the Skelhorne Street access open. They'd do well to make that 2-way and have cars entering and exiting the car park via Skelhorne street, which would give massive amounts of priority back to Queen Square, though I am not sure how feasible that would be
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
RE: £45m Liverpool City Centre Transport Scheme
Just walked down The Strand and thought how they could speed up bus services enormously -

At the moment the section between James Street and Liverpool ONE bus station is enormous - loads of room on either side. They could easily fit 4 lanes (2 each direction) on the current north bound carriage way, then slim the current southbound carriage way down to 2 lanes (1 each way) which are especially for buses. These could run in isolation from James Street to Liverpool ONE bus station, with no access to any other vehicles and no access to The Strand from James Street. This would remove the traffic lights from the junction with James Street and would probably save a good 3-5 minutes on bus journeys out of Liverpool ONE and up James Street.

This would then leave the extra space for improving the pavements for pedestrians, and would allow for an off-road cycle path to be implemented on the north-bound pavement, still leaving more than enough room for pedestrians, trees and street furniture.

The only issue is Liverpool ONE car park - there would still need to be traffic lights to get out - this would cross both The Strand and the bus lanes. That is, unless they can implement contraflow in the access tunnels - ie the current southbound tunnel becomes the 'IN' and the northbound access tunnel becomes the 'OUT', with a long and gentle lane merge to keep a good traffic flow. This would no doubt require some reconfiguration of the car park and the full cooperation of Q-Park, while meaning that access is only from the southbound lanes.

This is a very rough illustration, not to scale, but gets the idea across... red is the bus road; blue is The Strand; green is the cycle path : [Image: strand.png]

Thoughts?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)