|
Lancashire United Transport
|
|
||||||
|
RE: Lancashire United Transport
(24/06/2018 11:11)MTL0201 Wrote: It did make sense GMPTE taking over LUT, GMPTE was a natural competetor to LUT after the expantion of SELNEC to GMPTE, it would only have been a matter of time before LUT got brought out by someone else if it wasn't GMPTE anyway. LUT passed to SELNEC almost immediately but kept its own identity until the "birth" of GMT. This was because as I remember there were big differences in employment terms and conditions as well a standardisation issues around rolling stock. There was plenty of LUT activity which was west of the GM boundary also eg: around the Newton le Willows "hub". Also the LUT stock looked rubbish in orange. 
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Lancashire United Transport - MTL0201 - 16/06/2018, 12:03
RE: Lancashire United Transport - L80 - 23/06/2018, 20:31
RE: Lancashire United Transport - MTL0201 - 24/06/2018, 11:11
RE: Lancashire United Transport - L80 - 28/06/2018 21:07
RE: Lancashire United Transport - enrag2000 - 24/06/2018, 07:35
RE: Lancashire United Transport - L80 - 27/07/2018, 21:52
RE: Lancashire United Transport - enrag2000 - 28/07/2018, 08:50
RE: Lancashire United Transport - L80 - 28/07/2018, 12:01
RE: Lancashire United Transport - knutstransport - 30/07/2018, 13:55
RE: Lancashire United Transport - L80 - 30/07/2018, 19:37
RE: Lancashire United Transport - knutstransport - 31/07/2018, 09:06
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)