30/10/2015, 19:28
|
|
Katie
East Lancs EL2000
|
Joined: Aug 2012
|
|
RE: WBT Network Warrington
(30/10/2015 18:17)Valandil Wrote: On a completely different subject, I wonder whether the upcoming changes to the 16(A) will mean a redesign of running boards or if they will just keep the same patterns as before but just have some of the layover in a different place.
Ten minutes between a 16(A) and a 14/15 would be an awful lot ... and in my opinion it would create a better balance of layover if they used this opportunity to spread the layover to some of the Stockton Heath services which all currently only get 5 minutes between runs, e.g. doing something like this if it's possible:
46[00-15] -> 15[23-05] -> 16A[13-43] -> 35o5i[50-55]
8o10Ci[30-32] -> 10Co8i[40-45] -> 15[53-35] -> 16A[43-13] -> 5o35i[20-25]
And separately:
Here, XX[yy-zz] means service XX leaving town at yy past the hour and returning at zz past the hour.
10Co8i means a service 10C outbound followed by a service 8 inbound.
This would still be far from perfect as the 5 and 35 would still only have 5 minutes' layover before picking up the following 8/46, but would be an improvement.
Under this arrangement, the 3/4A and the 1[10-36] and 2[40-08] would be 'decoupled' from the 15/16A and the 14/16 would still only interwork with each other.
This sounds pretty good to me but I must confess you have somewhat blinded me with science.
|
|
Messages In This Thread |
RE: WBT Network Warrington - Katie - 30/10/2015 19:28
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 24 Guest(s)
|