|
Merseyrail
|
|
||||||
|
RE: Merseyrail
(11/08/2020 20:39)507022 Wrote: 508110 is the next unit for withdrawal possibly in the next week or two. Presumably that and 508134 will be taken for scrap soon after that to make room for the increasing number of 777s that are appearing on the networkAny dates yet for 777's entering service Cheers Rob Day Formerly 51537 |
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: Merseyrail
(12/08/2020 06:25)ls1911 Wrote: No, theres still no drivers trained on them. That is what i thought,i would not think too many old units would be going for scrap just yet in case of a return to pre virus levels. Cheers Rob Day Formerly 51537 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: Merseyrail
Article in todays Liverpool Echo of a chap who has launched a complaint against Merseyrail after they fined him £60 for resting his feet on the framework underneath a seat. The man said his feet wernt on the actual seat but I find the byelaw to be quite clear and simple. no feet on any part of the seat or seat structure. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: Merseyrail
508130 has suffered a graffiti attack. its working the Ormskirk line today as a 6 car with 508111. Also read on the Mersey Railways Facebook page that 508110 was withdrawn from service after working the Chester line last night. it will be used as a parts donor before eventual scrapping. 508110 was the first unit to be refurbished at Eastleigh works back in 2003. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: Merseyrail
508134 & 508110 are due to be towed to Sims Metals in South Wales for scrap on Sunday |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: Merseyrail
(14/08/2020 08:39)wirralbus Wrote: So Merseyrail are now back to 57 units , its at this point maintaining the units becomes very important Erm...maintaining the units has ALWAYS been important! SK15 GZG
2010 | 2345 | 2474 | 2590 | 3052 | 3059 | 3061 | 5314 | 6408 | 6606 | 7537 4164 | 4593 | 4664 | 4670 | 4672 | 4678 | 4836 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: Merseyrail
I am hoping that at least 1 of each class is preserved. After all, a 502 and 503 were preserved so why not a 507 & 508 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 92 Guest(s)