Go Goodwins

[knutstransport]

RE: Go Goodwins

(31/08/2017 23:02)Mayneway Wrote:  Makes no difference. They sign a contract and agree to the terms of the contract, part of which is vehicles are to be low floor and under 15 years of age.
As I've mentioned already an independant sadly no longer around used to be heavily criticised for using elderly vehicles with cherished plates on on school services, plus it's not exactly fair on operators who stringlently make sure all their fleet are well below the 15 year age mark.

It's not so bad of they are used occasionally when nothing else is available but if there our every day it's really not good enough.

Indeed. If an operator wins a contract for being the lowest priced bidder and then doesn't comply with the terms of the contract, then it's unfair on the other operators who placed bids and would have complied with the contract terms.

Does anyone know why Go Goodwins replaced modern buses with older vehicles? I heard YX11 CNE and YX11 CNF were released because they wanted a consistent fleet of Solos, which is fair enough. However, why did Solos YJ08 PJU and YJ08 PJV join them at D&G Bus when they have much older Solos in the fleet?