17/01/2026, 13:18
(17/01/2026 12:53)chris-s Wrote: [ -> ]Heard next Friday, the delay was due to a legal matter...its better to delay and do things the correct way than get it wrong.
Yes, I quite agree.
(17/01/2026 12:53)chris-s Wrote: [ -> ]Heard next Friday, the delay was due to a legal matter...its better to delay and do things the correct way than get it wrong.
(18/01/2026 21:26)peter Wrote: [ -> ]The draft list of services for Sefton, Knowsley and Liverpool has been published by the CA:
https://liverpoolcityregion-ca.moderngov...20List.pdf
The associated doc outlines the following list of improvements:
For Knowsley the following network changes are being made:
• Regular link between Kirkby and Halewood seven-days a week via Huyton
Industrial Estate
• Direct service between Halewood and Whiston Hospital
• Improved provision to Broadgreen Hospital
• Improved provision to Knowsley Village and Knowsley Industrial Park
• Evening & Sunday journeys introduced on some services
For Liverpool the following network changes are being taken forward:
• Improved link from Speke, Mossley Hill, Smithdown Road, and Vauxhall to
Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool Women’s University Hospital, and
Knowledge Quarter
• A more consistent and customer friendly timetable linking Netherley to
Broadgreen Hospital, Alder Hey Hospital, and Liverpool Women’s University
Hospital
• Introduction of a half hourly service along Great Howard Street
• Evening & Sunday journeys introduced on some services
For Sefton the following network changes are being taken forward:
• Circular service introduced in Southport improving links to Southport &
Formby District General Hospital
• Introduction of a service linking to Ocean Plaza in Southport
• Improved links from Litherland and Pendle to Aintree University Hospital
• Evening & Sunday journeys introduced on some services
• Evening journeys on service 300 to operate in full to/from Southport
https://liverpoolcityregion-ca.moderngov...Update.pdf
(19/01/2026 01:49)gka472l Wrote: [ -> ]What seems to be listed as route 5 (Liverpool to Sandhills) is what I assume is the 2 now.....can't see any reason to renumber it as there doesn't seem to be a route 2 anywhere else.....
(19/01/2026 01:49)gka472l Wrote: [ -> ]What seems to be listed as route 5 (Liverpool to Sandhills) is what I assume is the 2 now.....can't see any reason to renumber it as there doesn't seem to be a route 2 anywhere else.....
(18/01/2026 21:26)peter Wrote: [ -> ]The draft list of services for Sefton, Knowsley and Liverpool has been published by the CA:
https://liverpoolcityregion-ca.moderngov...20List.pdf
The associated doc outlines the following list of improvements:
For Knowsley the following network changes are being made:
• Regular link between Kirkby and Halewood seven-days a week via Huyton
Industrial Estate
• Direct service between Halewood and Whiston Hospital
• Improved provision to Broadgreen Hospital
• Improved provision to Knowsley Village and Knowsley Industrial Park
• Evening & Sunday journeys introduced on some services
For Liverpool the following network changes are being taken forward:
• Improved link from Speke, Mossley Hill, Smithdown Road, and Vauxhall to
Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool Women’s University Hospital, and
Knowledge Quarter
• A more consistent and customer friendly timetable linking Netherley to
Broadgreen Hospital, Alder Hey Hospital, and Liverpool Women’s University
Hospital
• Introduction of a half hourly service along Great Howard Street
• Evening & Sunday journeys introduced on some services
For Sefton the following network changes are being taken forward:
• Circular service introduced in Southport improving links to Southport &
Formby District General Hospital
• Introduction of a service linking to Ocean Plaza in Southport
• Improved links from Litherland and Pendle to Aintree University Hospital
• Evening & Sunday journeys introduced on some services
• Evening journeys on service 300 to operate in full to/from Southport
https://liverpoolcityregion-ca.moderngov...Update.pdf
(18/01/2026 21:54)T42 PVM Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting the proposed Frequencies have not been mentioned, they was with St Helens as seen in the following link
https://liverpoolcityregion-ca.moderngov...x?ID=77567