Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website

Full Version: Hattons Travel (Nip On Transport)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Don't know if this has already been mentioned but Hattons appear to have gained a 58 plate dual door Enviro200, unsure of the reg. Saw it on schools in St.Helens today
(15/10/2018 18:22)Scania1996 Wrote: [ -> ]Don't know if this has already been mentioned but Hattons appear to have gained a 58 plate dual door Enviro200, unsure of the reg. Saw it on schools in St.Helens today

That belongs to ogdens
Hattons have won the 144 Bootle - Netherton Service from 5th November.

https://www.merseytravel.gov.uk/getting-...02018).pdf
(02/11/2018 11:40)T42 PVM Wrote: [ -> ]Hattons have won the 144 Bootle - Netherton Service from 5th November.

https://www.merseytravel.gov.uk/getting-...02018).pdf

That's a bit of a shock! Although not quite as much dead mileage as Warringtons Own Buses.
(02/11/2018 11:51)St Helens Rider Wrote: [ -> ]That's a bit of a shock! Although not quite as much dead mileage as Warringtons Own Buses.

At least Hattons have the spare Buses for it following the loss of the 607 in Wigan, will be strange seeing Hattons around Bootle tho
(02/11/2018 11:53)T42 PVM Wrote: [ -> ]At least Hattons have the spare Buses for it following the loss of the 607 in Wigan, will be strange seeing Hattons around Bootle tho

A short Enviro200 is on the 144 with a reg ending HTP, I think.
(05/11/2018 10:44)Barney Wrote: [ -> ]A short Enviro200 is on the 144 with a reg ending HTP, I think.

That will be DK65 HTP Then
In the December 2018 issue of "Buses" (Page 16), it states that Hatton's forms part of RATP-owned Selwyns. Does anyone know if that is correct, and if so, when did this happen ?
(16/11/2018 17:34)Bevan Price Wrote: [ -> ]In the December 2018 issue of "Buses" (Page 16), it states that Hatton's forms part of RATP-owned Selwyns. Does anyone know if that is correct, and if so, when did this happen ?

I seen this and thought it was factually incorrect. I would extend this plea for further info or will there be a correction in next month's issue.
(16/11/2018 17:49)St Helens Rider Wrote: [ -> ]I seen this and thought it was factually incorrect. I would extend this plea for further info or will there be a correction in next month's issue.

It's a bit of a strange mistake for them to make though ????
Reference URL's